Revisiting
the taxonomic status
and ecological partitioning of night monkeys genus Aotus in western
Colombia, with notes on Aotus zonalis Goldman, 1914
Revisando el estatus
taxonómico y la partición
ecológica de los monos nocturnos del género Aotus en
el noroccidente de Colombia, con notas sobre Aotus zonalis Goldman,
1914
Hugo Mantilla-Meluk1,
Alex Mauricio Jiménez-Ortega2
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech
University, Lubbock, TX, USA. e-mail:
hugo.mantilla@ttu.edu
2 Universidad Tecnológica del Chocó,
Quibdó, Colombia. e-mail:
almajior@hotmail.com
Fecha recepción: Octubre 5,
2010 Fecha aprobación:
Febrero 4, 2011
Abstract
As part of the project Programa Regional de Biodiversidad, subprograma
Línea Base de Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad del Chocó,
designed to document the mammalian fauna of the Biogeographic
Chocó, museum voucher specimens from the Colombian Chocoan
Region deposited in American institutions have been taxonomically
assessed in the past three years. Herein, we review the morphological
variation, distribution patterns, and taxonomy of night monkeys in the
genus Aotus from northwestern Colombia deposited at the Field Museum of
Natural History (FMNH), and GIS based analyses and Maxent modeling are
used to define the geographic extent and ecological limiting factors of
the analyzed taxa. Our Principal Component Analysis showed high
variation in skull morphology among Aotus from northwestern Colombia.
However, differences observed in both discrete and morphometric
analyses of the interorbital region of A. zonalis (more depressed than
that in the grographically adjacent A. griseimembra and A. lemurinus)
appear as good diagnostic characters for this taxon. Our analyses on
the ecological variation associated with collecting localities of Aotus
specimens support the geographic subdivision previously proposed based
on karyotypic data. Based on obtained models of potential distribution
we define the location and extent of potential contact zones among
species of Aotus from northwestern Colombia.
Keywords: Aotus;
A. zonalis; Biogeographic Chocó;
Ecological partitioning; Skull morphology; Taxonomy.
Resumen
Como producto del proyecto Programa Regional de Biodiversidad,
subprograma Línea Base de Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad del
Chocó, que busca documentar la biodiversidad del Chocó
biogeográfico colombiano, se han revisado en los últimos
tres años, especímenes museológicos depositados en
colecciones americanas. En este trabajo se evalúa la
variación en la morfología craneal de especímenes
de monos nocturnos género Aotus, del noroccidente de
Colombia depositados en el Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH), y se
utiliza modelamiento basado en sistemas de información
geográfica (SIG) y Maxent en la definición de los
límites geográficos y ecológicos de los taxa
analizados. El presente análisis de componentes principales
mostró un alto grado de variabilidad en morfología
craneal entre las poblaciones de Aotus del noroccidente colombiano. Sin
embargo, diferencias observadas en análisis de caracteres
discretos y morfométricos de la región interorbital de A.
zonalis (caracterizada por ser más deprimida con respecto a las
geográficamente adyacentes A. griseimembra y A. lemurinus), se
presentan como buenos caracteres diagnósticos para este
taxón. Nuestro análisis de la variación ambiental
asociada con las localidades de colecta de los especímenes de
Aotus analizados, apoya la subdivisión geográfica
previamente sugerida por datos cariotípicos. Basados en los
modelos de distribución obtenidos se define también
la ubica-
ción y extensión geográfica de potenciales zonas
de contacto entre las especies de Aotus del noroccidente colombiano.
Palabras clave: Aotus;
A. zonalis; Chocó biogeográfico; Partición
ecológica; Morfología craneal; Taxonomía.
Introduction
With the aim of creating a database of the mammalian species of the
Biogeographic Chocó, specimens deposited in American
Institutions have been documented and their systematic status has been
revisited in the last three years. Our work has been focused on those
groups of mammals characterized by controversial taxonomic histories
such Aotus zonalis, Goldman, 1914 described from the Canal Zone,
Gatún, Panama, which constitutes the only currently recognized
Chocoan night monkey (Defler, 2003, 2004; Defler and Bueno, 2007).
Difficulties in interpreting the morphological and coat color variation
among night monkeys in the genus Aotus has resulted in controversy on
the designation of appropriate taxonomic status for night monkey
populations from the western versant of the Andes in Colombia (Defler
and Bueno, 2007). Recent molecular and karyotipic analyses have
provided important insights on the systematic relationships among
geographically distinctive Aotus variants, supporting a greater
diversity within the genus than previously documented (Defler and
Bueno, 2007; Groves, 2001, 2005). Based on karyotypic data, Defler and
Bueno (2007) recognized six species of Aotus for the Colombian
territory with a suggested geographic structure (A. brumbacki, A.
griseimembra, A. jorgehernandezi, A. lemurinus, A. trivirgatus, A.
vociferans, and A. zonalis). Three of these species occur on the
western versant of the Andean System distributed as follows: A.
griseimembra (Elliot, 1912) (2N=52-54), distributed along the eastern
bank of the Sinú River east across the lowlands to high
elevations of the Caribbean Region up to west of the Gulf of Maracaibo
in Venezuela (Defler, 2004); A. lemurinus (I. Geoffroy-St. Hilaire,
1843) (2N=55-56), distributed along the Andean range above 1000 m; and
A. zonalis (Goldman, 1914) (2n=58), distributed across the lowlands of
the Biogeographic Chocó north up to Costa Rica in Central
America (Ford, 1994).
Herein, we revisit Chocoan specimens of A. zonalis deposited at the
Field Museum of Natural History and present a preliminary analysis on
the macroecological component of the observed morphological variation
among Aotus species from western Colombia: A. griseimembra, A.
lemurinus, and A. zonalis. In addition, models of potential
distribution created for these three taxa are used to analyze the
location and extent of potential zones of contact among species of
Aotus from northwestern Colombia.
Materials and
methods
Group
designation. Craniodental and external characters in the
descriptions of A. lemurinus (I. Geoffroy-St.Hilaire, 1843), A.
griseimembra (Elliot, 1912), and A. zonalis (Goldman, 1914) were
evaluated for the analyzed individuals. Age of the specimens was
estimated based upon totally erupted and functional dentition, as well
as totally fused spheno-occipital and/or ethmoid sutures.
Morphological
variation. In order to assess the morphological variation
among Aotus populations from the western versant of the Colombian
Andes, a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on 30
craniodental variables (Appendix I) of 32 Colombian Aotus (29 adults
and three juveniles (FMNH 68859, 68861, 70679, that were removed after
a preliminary analysis) deposited at the scientific collections of the
Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH) (Appendix I), including A.
griseimembra (N=11), A. lemurinus (N=18), and A. zonalis (N=3) (
Table
1) in the statistical package PAST, available at
http://www.nhm.uio.no/norges/past/download.html. In addition, the
variation of discrete skull characters included in the description of
A. zonalis (Goldman, 1914) was also investigated for the three analyzed
taxa.
Environmental
variation among Aotus sampling localities. To determine
the degree of ecological differentiation among analyzed sampling
localities of A. griseimembra, A, lemurinus and A. zonalis (including
their type localities) (N=12, Appendix II), a PCA was performed on four
environmental variables (Elevation, Mean Annual Maximum Temperature,
Mean Annual Minimum Temperature, and Mean Annual Precipitation).
Environmental data were derived from the Bioclim data set available at
http://www.worldclim. org/bioclim
Finally, to test for ecological similarities among analyzed sampling
localities of Aotus, an
ecological niche model was created for each one of the analyzed
taxon by applying
the Maxent algorithm (program available at http://www.cs.princeton.
edu/~schapire/maxent/) following the procedures described in (Phillips
et al., 2006). Overlap among obtained outputs was used to infer
the location and extent of potential contact zones among species of
Aotus from the northwestern range of Colombia.
Results
Principal
components analyses. Our PCA showed a relatively low degree
of morphological differentiation among the three analyzed taxa in
Aotus, with A. lemurinus having the greatest range of skull variation.
In our PCA’s morphospace, samples of A. lemurinus partially
overlapped A. griseimembra and A. zonalis (
Figure
1). Most of the
observed skull variation was explained by the first two components
(42.4 and 9.10%, respectively) (
Table 2).
Samples of A.griseimembra and
A. zonalis were primarily located on the III quadrant of the
morphospace of our PCA, with negative loadings suggesting a smaller
size for these two taxa when compared with analyzed samples of A.
lemurinus (
Figure 1). Our PCA on
measurements of the interorbital
region is presented in
Figure 2.
Discriminant function analysis. In our DFA only 55.2% of
the
samples identified as A. griseimembra and A. lemurinus were correctly
assigned to predicted groups (
Table 3).
However, all samples of A.
zonalis (N=3) were correctly assigned in our DFA.
Discrete characters in A. zonalis. Discrete characters observed
in A.
zonalis are commented in the Discussion section of this work.
Ecological
differentiation among Aotus from northwestern Colombia. In
our PCA most of the observed environmental variation among analyzed
sampling localities was explained by the first component (98%) with
elevation having positive loading among A. lemurinus localities and
precipitation having positive loadings for A. zonalis localities at the
department of Chocó (
Figure 3). As
product of our analysis we
identified three clearly differentiated geographic groups as follows:
- Group 1: Andean samples and Sierra Nevada de Santa
Marta (A. griseimembra and A. lemurinus).
- Group 2: Colombian Caribbean Coast, Colombian
Urabá and Gatún Region in Panama (A. griseimembra and A.
zonalis).
- Group 3: Chocoan locality at río
Baudó (A. zonalis).
Ecological overlap and potential contact zones among Aotus species from
northwestern Colombia. In our Maxent models A. griseimem-bra
appear as
the most resilient species with the widest distribution among
northwestern Colombian Aotus. When our Maxent models constructed for A.
griseimembra and A. lemurinus were evaluated at a predictive value of
50%, A. griseimembra distribution overlapped 100% of the predicted area
for A. lemurinus. At probability values greater than 80% there was low
overlap among the three analyzed species of Aotus (
Figure 4). Potential
areas of overlapping among Aotus species from northwestern Colombia are
shown in
Figure 4 and commented in the
Discussion section of this work.
Discussion
Morphometric
analyses. In a revision of the taxonomy and the
distribution of night monkeys, genus Aotus, Ford (1994) carried out
multivariate analyses of craniodental measurements in combination with
the analysis of pelage patterns and color, chromosomal data and blood
protein variations. Ford (1994) concluded that there was «good
support» for A. brumbacki, A. lemurinus, A. griseimembra and A.
zonalis distributed in northern Colombia and the colombian Andes and
Panamá. Our PCA and DFA performed on the whole set of skull
measurements failed in producing a clear discrimination among analyzed
population of Aotus from northwestern Colombia. However, most of the
analyzed samples of A. lemurinus had positive loadings on the first
component, suggesting differences in size between this taxon from the
Andean region, and A. griseimembra and A. zonalis from the lowlands of
the Caribbean and the Chocoan Region of Colombia respectively (
Figure
1). Aotus lemurinus proved to have longer skulls (with greater
loadings
associated with condylobasal length) and broader interorbital regions
(associated with greater loadings for interorbital constriction width)
when compared with the two analyzed lowland forms A. griseimembra and
A. zonalis (
Table 1 and
Figure 5). We analyzed measurements associated
with the interorbital region in a separate PCA obtaining a better
differentiation between A. lemurinus and A. zonalis with no overlap
between these two forms in the morphospace. The morphometric gap
between A. lemurinus and A. zonalis was filled by A. griseimembra
(
Figure 2).
Due to our low sample size, males and females were treated together in
both PCA and DFA. The low differentiation in our morphometric analyses
can be associated with our small sample size and skull differences
associated with sexual dimorphism. In addition, the observed variation
in terms developmental stages in our sampling, prevented a better
differentiation among groups. Our knowledge on the allometry of members
of the genus Aotus is still poor and to differentiate between immature
and mature individuals is difficult based on skull morphology alone.
Significance
of discrete characters, the case of interorbital and nasal
features in A. zonalis. As Hershkovitz asserts, the interorbital
region
may have been narrow in primitive platyrrhines (Hershkovitz, 1977).
Among living cebids, the interorbital region of Aotus and Saimiri agree
with Callicebus but their orbits are wider relative to cranial breadth
(Hershkovitz, 1977). Major orbital expansion in Aotus has been lateral
but median compression is also evident in the narrowness of its
interorbital region (Hershkovitz, 1977). As documented in callithichids
(Hershkovitz, 1977), the narrower interorbital septum of small species
of platyrrhines (Aotus, Callicebus, and Saimiri) is due to relative
larger eyes in smaller heads. Among higher primates the nasoturbinal is
best developed in platyrrhines particularly in prehensile-tailed
cebids, but most notably in pithecines. The ethmoturbinal II, as well
of the ectoturbinal I are well developed in Aotus contrasting other
platyrrhines (Hershkovitz, 1977). Although not well documented among
platyrrhines, enlargements of the interorbital region and their
associated turbinal systems have been linked with smell functions.
Goldman (1914) mentioned that although skull of A. zonalis is in
general broader to that of A. griseimembra, with the greater breath
more noticeable in the braincase, the interorbital region of A. zonalis
is «more depressed materially altering the facial angle»
(Goldman, 1914; p. 6) (
Figure 1). This
character was consistent among
the three adult A. zonalis specimens analyzed in this work. In the
scatter plot of our PCA on three nasal and interorbital measurements,
individuals of A. zonalis clustered together (
Figure
2). However, a
depressed interorbital region was a variable character among
individuals of A. griseimembra and A. lemurinus. Juvenile and sub-adult
individuals of A. griseimembra and A. lemurinus presented a more
depressed interorbital region when compared with adult individuals,
suggesting that the presence of a depressed interorbital region in A.
zonalis might be a neotenic characteristic in this taxon.
Distribution patterns of Aotus in northwestern Colombia.
Hernández-Camacho and Cooper (1976) restricted A. lemurinus to
the Colombian Andes (1000-1500 m up to 3000-3200 m) and A.
griseimembra to the northern lowlands of the Colombian Caribbean
Region, Santa Marta mountains, west to río Sinú,
río San Jorge, lower río Cauca and lowlands of middle and
upper río Magdalena. Same authors recognize the form A. zonalis
as the night monkey of north-western Colombia, in the department of
Chocó, extending its distribution up to Panamá. In spite
of the controversies on the taxonomic status of Aotus populations in
northwestern Colombia, the geographic subdivision proposed by
Hernández-Camacho and Cooper (1976) still accepted (Defler and
Bueno, 2007). Hershkovitz (1983) recognized lemurinus and griseimembra
as distinct, but considered them to be subspecies of A. lemurinus; he
made no mention of A. zonalis, but as he ascribed Central American
night monkeys to A. lemurinus lemurinus, by implication he was
regarding it as a synonym of this latter form. Groves (2001) followed
Hernández-Camacho and Cooper (1976) in recognizing A. zonalis as
the typical form in Panama, and listed it as a subspecies of A.
lemurinus along with A. griseimembra and A. brumbacki. Defler et al.
(2001) concluded that the karyotype of A. hershkovitzi
Ramírez-Cerquera, 1983 (from the upper río Cusiana,
Boyacá, Colombia; 2n=58) was in fact that of true lemurinus, and
they also mentioned that karyotypes considered by Hershkovitz (1983) as
lemurinus in the northwestern distribution of the genus, were in fact
of A. zonalis. Defler et al. (2001) and others (Defler, 2003, 2004;
Defler and Bueno, 2007) concluded that Aotus lemurinus of Hershkovitz
(1983) represent three karyotypically well-defined species of night
monkeys as follows: 1) lowlands of Panamá and the Chocó
region of Colombia represent A. zonalis, 2) Magdalena valley, A.
griseimembra, and 3) those from above 1500 m A. lemurinus.
Potential
contact zones among Aotus from northwestern Colombia. As
shown in our Maxent model outputs (
Figure 4),
even at low
predictive values (80%) it is possible to identify several areas of
potential
contact among A. griseimembra, A. lemu-rinus, and A. zonalis. Aotus
griseimembra appears as the most ecologically resilient species of
Aotus partially overlapping the distribution of A. lemurinus, and
the area of the model obtained for A. zonalis. Intermingle between A.
griseimembra and A. lemurinus is most likely to occur along the
northern slopes of the Central and Western Cordilleras, as well as
along the
slopes of the Serranía del Perijá and the Sierra Nevada
de Santa Marta (
Figure 4). In the same way,
A. zonalis and A. griseimembra
overlap in their ecological requirements at the northwestern most
corner
of Colombia in the area of the Gulf of Urabá and the Colombian
Darién. Although our Maxent model identified
this area as part of the predictive output of A. lemurinus, probability
values associated with this portion of the model were lower than 50%;
in addition, based on morphological trends observed in the present work
we consider unlikely for A. l. lemurinus, the typical form of the
Andean region, to be present in the lowlands of the Chocó.
Conclusion
Despite of the low resolution of our PCA and DFA analyses, we agree
with Defler and Bueno (2007) in the recognition of A. griseimembra, A.
lemurinus, and A. zonalis as valid species. However, we disagree with
Defler and Bueno (2007) on their argument on the validity of
morphological characters to differentiate among the so called
subspecies in the A. lemurinus group sensu Hershkovitz (1983).
Taking into account the observed ecological overlapping and low
morphological differentiation among Aotus from northwestern Colombia
the potential presence of hybrid populations is high. The presence of
hybrids and the lack of strong mechanisms of sexual isolation do not
necessarily imply the absence of autopomorphic characters among
karyologically distinguishable populations of Aotus from northern
Colombia. In our work, the three adult individuals of A. zonalis
analyzed have a more depressed interorbital region contrasting the
broad interorbital region of A. griseimembra and A. lemurinus. Based on
the analysis of our niche model we agree with Hernández-Camacho
and Cooper (1976) geographic subdivision among Aotus from northwestern
Colombia.
Aknowledgements
This work would not have been possible without the generous cooperation
of B. D. Patterson, L. R. Heaney, B. Starck, N. Upham, and the staff of
the Field Museum of Natural History. We thank all of them for their
support and assistance. We recognize the generous contribution of Dr.
Miguel Angel Medina Rivas (Program Coordinator: Cooperación
Gestión Ambiental Local y Cadenas Productivas UTCH-NUFFIC). Dr.
Medina Rivas commitment to the understanding of the megadiversity
enclosed by the Chocoan region has been inspirational for several
generations of young Chocoan biologists. Financial support was provided
by the project: Programa Regional de Biodiversidad, subprograma
Línea Base de Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad del Chocó;
the Short term visitors program of the Field Museum of Natural History;
and the Department of Biological Sciences of Texas Tech University.
Literature
cited
- Defler TR. 2003. Primates of Colombia. Bogotá:
Conservation
International.
- Defler TR. 2004. Primates of Colombia. Bogotá:
Conservation
International.
- Defler TR, Bueno ML. 2007. Aotus diversity and the species
problem.
Primate Conserv. 22: 55-70.
- Defler TR, Bueno ML, Hernández-Camacho JI. 2001.
Taxonomic
status of Aotus hershkovitzi: its relationship to Aotus lemurinus
lemurinus. Neotrop Primates. 9 (2): 37-52.
- Elliot DG. 1912. New species of monkeys of the genera
Seniocebus,
Aloutta, and Aotus. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 31: 31-3.
- Ford SM. 1994. Taxonomy and distribution of the owl
monkey.
In: Baer JF, Weller RW, Kahoma I (Eds.). Aotus the owl monkey. New
York: Academic Press. p. 1-57.
- Geoffroy-Saint HI. 1843. Sur les singes Amérique
composant les
genres Nyctipithicus saimiri et Callithriche. Compt. rendus hebdom.
Séanc. Acad Sci Paris. 16: 1150-3.
- Goldman EA. 1914. Descriptions of five new mammals from
Panamá.
Smithson Misc Collect. 63 (5): 1-7.
- Groves C. 2001. Primate taxonomy. Washington, DC,
London:
Smithsonian Institution Press.
- Groves CP. 2005. Order primates. In: Wilson DE, Reeder DM.
(Eds.).
Mammal species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference. Vol
1. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 111-84.
- Hernández-Camacho J, Cooper RW. 1976. The non-human
primates of
Colombia. In: Thorington RWJr, Heltne PG. (Eds.). Neotropical
primates: field studies and conservation. Washington, DC: National
Academy of Sciences. p. 35-69.
- Hershkovitz P. 1977. Living New World monkey (Plathyrrini).
Vol. 1.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1117 pp.
- Hershkovitz P. 1983. Two new species of night monkeys,
genus Aotus
(Cebidae: Plathyrhhini), a preliminary report on Aotus taxonomy. Am J
Prim. 4: 209-43.
- Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum
entropy modeling
of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model. 190: 231-59.
Appendix
I
Craniodental measurements analyzed: Brain case length (BCL); external
interorbital width (IOC); anterorbital constriction (AOC); orbit height
(OH); nasal length (NL); nasal width (NW); tooth row (TR); greatest
length of the skull (GLS); Condyobasal length (CB); palatal length
(PAL); zygomatic (ZYG); braincase width (BCW); mastoid breadth (MB);
brain case height (BCH); orbital height ext (OHE); molars row (MR);
premolars row (PR); first molar width (M1W); canine to canine distance
(C-C); internal width across molars (AIM); maximum distance of the
nasals (MDN); temporal width (TW); basioccipital length (BOL); molar to
molar length (M-M); mandibular length (ML); ramus height (RM);
mandibular length 1 (MnL1); mandibular length 2 (MnL2); mandibular
toothrow (MTR); and distance across mandibular canines (C-CM).
Appendix
II
Collecting localities associated with analyzed specimens of Aotus: A.
griseimembra.- (N=11) COLOMBIA: Department of
Córdoba, Catival, upper río San Jorge, 120 m (FMNH 68859
f, 68861 f, 68860 f, 68862 f); Department of Sucre, Colosó, Las
Campanas, 175 m (FMNH 68850 f, 68851 f, 86652 f, 68853 f, 68855 f,
68856 f); Undetermined locality (FMNH); A. lemurinus. (N=18) COLOMBIA,
Department of Antioquia, Bellavista (FMNH 6960 f, 69608 m, 69609 f,
69610 f); Urabá (FMNH 69612 f, 69613 f); Department of Cauca,
río Mechengue (FMNH 88471 f); Munchique (FMNH 88470 m);
Department of Huila, Acevedo, Aguas Claras (FMNH 70672 m, 70673 m,
70674 m, 70675 m, 70676 f); San Agustín, San Antonio 2,300
m (FMNH 70677 f, 70678 m, 70679 m, 70680 f); Undetermined locality
(FMNH); A. zonalis. (N=3) COLOMBIA, Deparment of Chocó,
río Baudó, río Sandó (FMNH 90322 f, 90323
f, 90324 f).
f = female m = male