Change the chlorophyll content index of five plant species under different light regimes established in a neotropical understory of Venezuela

Authors

  • Sairo Rangel Marquina, VE Universidad Nacional Experimental Sur del Lago "Jesús María Semprum"
  • Juan Pablo Uzcátegui Varela, VE Universidad Nacional Experimental Sur del Lago "Jesús María Semprum"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18636/bioneotropical.v8i4.761

Keywords:

Chlorophyll, Chlorophyll meter, Ecological studies, MCC-200 Opti-Sciences

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the chlorophyll content index (CCI) in field conditions as an indicator of acclimatization in changes in the light environment. Methodology: with the use of portable chlorophyll meter MCC-200 Opti-Sciences two experiences were carried out; the first consisted in determining the CCI in plants under conditions contrasting light, shade and full solar exposure, using four species of the order Zingiberales Heliconia bihai, Heliconia latispatha, Heliconia platystachys and Calathea lutea. The results were analyzed through the Mann-Whitney U test. The second experience consisted of evaluating if the values of the CCI change throughout the day, product of changes in the optical properties of the leaf, using the species Syngonium vellozianum (Family: Araceae). Twelve individuals were selected for each light condition and measurements were taken once a month for three continuous months, measurements were taken at 10:00, 12:00, 14:00 and 16:00 h. The results were analyzed through a Kruskal-Wallis statistical test. Results: for the four species studied, a different CCI was recorded between the shade and sun populations (P <0.05), being in all cases greater for the shade, on the other hand, the changes throughout the day in S. vellozianum no presentation significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The CCI in the plants studied under field conditions is a good indicator of acclimatization to light changes and allows measuring the adjustment of the chlorophyll content over time in field conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biber P. 2007. Evaluating a chlorophyll content meter on three coastal wetland plants species. Agricul, Food Environme Sci. 1(2): 1-11.

Calleja R, Kania E, Contreras A, Peppi C, Morales L. 2013. Evaluación de un método no destructivo para estimar las concentraciones de clorofila en hojas de variedades de uva de mesa. IDESIA. 31(4): 19-26.

Carter G, Knapp A. 2001. Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. Am J Botany. 88(4): 677-84.

Cate T, Perkins T. 2003. Chlorophyll content monitoring in sugar maple (Acer saccharum). Tree Physiology. 23: 1077-9.

Costa F, Penna F, Figueiredo F. 2011. Guide to the Zingiberales of PPBio site in Brazilian Western Amazonia. Áttema Design Editorial; 284 pp.

De Lima R, De Mello R, Reyes A, Caione G. 2014. Efecto del horario de medición, posición y porción de la hoja en los índices de clorofila de la papa. Idesia. 32 (4): 23-8.

Franiel I, Babczyńska A. 2011. The growth and reproductive effort of Betula pendula Roth in a heavy-metal polluted area. Polish J Environ Stud. 20 (4): 1097-101.

Gonçalves FC, dos Santos UM, da Silva EA. 2008. Evaluation of a portable chlorophyll meter to estimate chlorophyll concentrations in leaves of tropical wood species from Amazonian forest. Hoehnea. 35 (2): 185-8.

Hoyos J. 1999. Plantas tropicales ornamentales de tallo herbáceo. Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle; 592 pp. IBM Corp. 2011.

IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY:IBM Corp.

Kress W. 1997. A synopsis of the genus Heliconia (Heliconiaceae) in Venezuela, whit one new variety. Biollania. 6:407-30.

Martínez D, Guiamet J. 2004. Distortion of the SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter reading by changes in irradiance and leaf

water status. Agronomie. 24: 41-6.

Opti-Sciences, Inc. 2010. CCM-200 plus chlorophyll contentmeter. Operator’s manual. 24 pp.

Quintero M, Riera L. 1988. La comercialización del café en la Cuenca del Mocoties. (Trabajo de grado). Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de los Andes. Mérida; 52 pp.

Rangel S, García-Núñez C, Jaimez R. (2014). Ecofisiología de Heliconia bihai L. en el Sur del Lago de Maracaibo. Editorial Académica Española; 101 pp.

Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP. 2002. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytologist. 153: 185-94.

Rundel P, Sharifi M, Gibson A, Esler K. 1998. Structural and physiological to light environments in neotrópical Heli- conia (Heliconiaceae). J Trop Ecol. 14: 789-801.

Schulze ED, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstein K. (2005). Plant Ecology. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York; 702 pp.

Taiz L, Zeiger E. 1998. Plant physiology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers; 792 pp.

Published

2019-12-19

How to Cite

Rangel Marquina, S., & Uzcátegui Varela, J. P. (2019). Change the chlorophyll content index of five plant species under different light regimes established in a neotropical understory of Venezuela. JOURNAL OF NEOTROPICAL BIODIVERSITY, 8(4), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.18636/bioneotropical.v8i4.761

Issue

Section

ECOLOGY